Dr. Kary Mullis,
Biochemist, 1993 Nobel Prize for Chemistry: "If
there is evidence that HIV causes AIDS, there should be scientific documents
which either singly or collectively demonstrate that fact, at least
with a high probability. There is no such document."
(Sunday Times.. London 23 November 1993)
There is a lot of media hype, fueled by
the scientific and orthodox medical establishments, that HIV is the
cause of AIDS (Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome). This supposed etiological
factor has formed the basis for conducting researches into finding a
cure.
However since AIDS was discovered nothing seems to be yielding fruits
in the way of finding a definitive cure based on these researches. Why
is this so? Obviously something must be wrong somewhere. Scientists
and researchers know a lot about retroviruses and HIV is just one of
the retroviruses. But retroviruses do not kill their hosts since they
depend on them for their survival. Why is the HIV retrovirus behaving
differently from its group? If HIV is the cause of AIDS, why do we get
some patients who manifest all the symptoms of AIDS without any demonstrable
HIV in their system? On the corollary, why do we have some people who
are HIV positive yet they do not manifest the AIDS symptoms?
From what Dr. Kary Mullis said above, doesn't
it surprise you that there is no scientifically proven evidence that
HIV is the cause of AIDS?
The questions are many but the required answers do not seem to be coming
from our 'authorities' who religiously maintain that HIV is the cause
of AIDS!
However, there is a growing group of researchers
who are beginning to question the HIV-AIDS causation hypothesis. They
constitute a 'dissident' group from the 'loyalists' who officially chant
the mantra that HIV is the cause without any documented scientific proof!.
These 'dissidents' are saying that the virus myth hypothesis needs a
thorough rethink. Find out what these scientists are saying by CLICKING
HERE.
Related Links:
More HIV-AIDS Controversy